Hardware and software need to be ported into iPadOS

Options
1…910121415…17

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newcomer
    edited March 2022
    Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • nightjar
    nightjar Member Posts: 1,288 Guru
    Options

    Your "up-to-date" info is 4 years old.... sorry, but no longer quite accurate... and pre M1.

    There will certainly be separation of OS specialization for devices, but a huge amount is now merging which opens up efficiencies in development.

    Nothing baseless going on here. The indicators are real and becoming more & more obvious.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newcomer
    Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • nightjar
    nightjar Member Posts: 1,288 Guru
    Options

    The "indicators" I have shared are generally first party...

    That's how this works... bits and pieces of real things that are happening that indicate a convergence.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newcomer
    Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • nightjar
    nightjar Member Posts: 1,288 Guru
    Options

    All depends on how someone wants to define merging...

    Reality is that it's always going to be a matter of degree.

  • nightjar
    nightjar Member Posts: 1,288 Guru
    Options

    Hmm... where to focus development for customers who spend money??

    Apple has 65% worldwide market share in first quarter 2022:

    Screen Shot 2022-03-24 at 9.29.31 PM.png


  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newcomer
    Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • nightjar
    nightjar Member Posts: 1,288 Guru
    Options
    https://community.native-instruments.com/discussion/comment/10689#Comment_10689

    Your point is irrelevant... stat indicates a market demographic that spends money. Rather safe presumption that this demographic has similar proportion of people interested in music making as general population.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newcomer
    edited March 2022
    Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • nightjar
    nightjar Member Posts: 1,288 Guru
    Options
    https://community.native-instruments.com/discussion/comment/10691#Comment_10691

    If developing the software to implement what I wanted was easy, it would have been done already. Simple as that...

    Perfect reason to step back.... rethink.... then invest in a new infrastructure that offers easier development, faster implementation, and aims towards the demographic most likely to support the result.

    The investment by Francisco Partners and the teaming with iZotope isn't there to do more of the same.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newcomer
    Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Mutis
    Mutis Member Posts: 472 Pro
    edited March 2022
    Options
    https://youtu.be/KtRDqGKZdVc


    https://youtu.be/osTXU65KQMM

    Izotope has desktop/laptop pro apps but look where they are aiming for target demographics…

    https://youtu.be/XZAH_vf10So


    I’m not saying ditching the other revenue flow lines but related to AS adoption…

    “Apple Rosetta 2 is a translation mode that helps companies like iZotope enable existing software to run on Apple silicon machines more rapidly. We’ve prioritized completing Rosetta 2 compatibility for our entire catalog first.

    Apple silicon native software means that the entire program has been modified to run natively on the new processor architecture. iZotope is focusing on our flagship RX repair and Ozone mastering suites to be the first, and we intend to deliver these before the end of Q1 2022.”

    I’m trying to link the source article from izotope web but the forum can’t handle the link…

    https://support.izotope.com/hc/en-us/articles/4407777831699-iZotope-Compatibility-with-Apple-silicon

  • OhulahanBass
    OhulahanBass Member Posts: 141 Pro
    edited March 2022
    Options

    Maschine Micro control over updated iMaschine app would be rad. Or integrate iOS as an external screen to M+ for naming and organizing files, visualizing automations...


    NI might not want a fully capable iOS version of Maschine to compete with M+. If given the choice between Micro+iPad vs. M+ I think allot will choose the former and that is $350 sale vs. $1500.

  • nightjar
    nightjar Member Posts: 1,288 Guru
    Options
    https://community.native-instruments.com/discussion/comment/10769#Comment_10769

    Good thoughts on one variation of how things may unfold. And what might be attractive to NI in your scenario is ten $350 sales vs one $1500 sale. And those ten sales may also have ongoing subscriptions at various tiers.

Back To Top

Categories