How can I solve unstable Kontakt 7 Licening on my 3. (Dual-CPU)Server-Samplelibrary-Slave-PC

"already in contact", that is a joke nearly 3 Weeks after the Problem began to occur and was reported to me. And btw.: like in the very few (2-3) Answers before, there is still literally nothing in this "Answer" which shows any in depth investigation of anything I have documented, more over are there Links to Microsoft Windows 10 Supportpages, while it is clear since weeks, that the Problem occurs on a Dual-Xeon Win 11 Pro Workstation. Questions about the Version number of Plugin and Standalone shows, that this Answer also completely ignores the few Questions and responses which were included in the poor previous "Answers" as well as all Screenshots which already easily gave a visual answer to this question before it was posed by this so called "Technical Support". And no, this Problem might be more than simple FAQ-Links can solve. But a good technical support should be able to understand, when a problem might be founded in shortcomings of the Software itself. How else should a development section improve their Product, if not with taking care for the problems which occurs. And that the Native-Instrument-Authentication system a License-Management does not reflect the possibility that the same User might use a certain software more than on one System simultaneously. This is a real Problem especially as far Kontakt is meant to be a platform for the most available Samplelibraries on the market, which of course might be easily to much to be load all on a single system when you combine several of the most developed Libraries. So please just begin to take my Support-Request as serious as it deserves for a paying customer.
And if you really think, that your Product is not at all able to work in a setup with one Host and two Slave-Pc's (which ist since Years not that unusual when working with larger orchestral Libraries), why is Native-Instrument than not decent enough to state clear, that even if an installation on up to three PC's is explicitly allowed for Komplete CE-User, Kontakt is currently simply not able to be used in such a Network-Setup and refund me for a product, you can not deliver in the way it is meant to work. That would at least be kind of decent, but simply ignoring or answer

No I fear you simply miss the crucial point. The question is not how often you can install and use "one" License. That is pretty clear: even if you can install K7 on up to three PC's you can use only "one installation at any given time".
But: if you need more Kontakt 7 to be used simultaneously you obviously need to have as much licenses as you want to "use at any given time" to respect the Licens conditions. There can be no other reason to allow to buy further K7 Licenses if you already have one or even two in my case, than to allow to use more Kontakt at a given time as would be covered by a single License. (For Exsample if you want to use Vienna Ensemble on more than one PC, you also have to buy more Licenses and than you can use more Installations "at a given time" simultaneously.)
But obviously neither Native Instruments nor their Native Access seem to be ready to assign a certain Licens transparent and reliable to a certain system, as you can do for instance in ILok without Problem. And thus it makes no sense to allow the purchase of additional Licenses, if they are not at all able to let the Customer use them. Either they should rule out customers who are trying to buy additional Licenses for simutaneous use of the same Software on multiple Systems over one Account, or they should care for, that the user gets for what he has payed: another working Licens of Kontakt. But currently they are on the one hand opbviously not able or willing to allow the usage of multiple Licenses of the same Software, but go on to sell them as if a cutomer who already have one Licens, would be able to use it, what is obviously wrong. And not being honest in this case, that a customer should not be able to buy more than one License, this is my Eyes simply not decent. They should of course refund me, if they are not ready to sell working second or third licenses but nevertheless sell them as if they were usable. It is a mess, and the better way out would be to get the System to be capeable of the asignment and use of multple Licenses.

Nothing you quoted excluded in any way to buy and use more than one Licens (which is something absolutly normal for nearly every other product in the market). No one is talking about "server Farms" but about simple Host-Slave-Networks of two or three Systems, for which Vienna Ensemble is made since more than and decade. And: If NI would not support the possession, why ever did they still make possible to buy more than one Licens. It would be pretty simple to restrict buying more than one Licens for one Account (as they do with Updates and Upgrades for those who "qualify") on those who dont already own a Licens for one certain Product. My Point is, they have sold me a third licens, but are not ready to let me use what I have payed for. So either they refund me ("sorry we sold something, what we cant provide. Get your Money back") or they provide what they have sold (Sorry, of course we manage to allow you to use what we already took your Money for"). Everything else is more likely to Fraud than to any kind of justified decent behavior. Not sure what else you think, but after nearly three weeks without any constructive reaction, a lont rant is simply what they absolutly deserve, to understand, that delaying Non-Support" is simply awful ****** and anything, but of course not the correct reaction on their mistake.

1. again there is no where at all stated, that it would be impossible to use a second License on the same Account. To pretend that is simply wrong. It is only said what you can do with one license but nothing said about any second license. And no to buy something is always a business of two partners, one who is willing to buy and the other who offers a certain product, which he promises is able to do certain things what it is bought for: and that is just "to use it". When they sell it, while they know you cant use it without explicitly stating under which conditions it could not be used (what they do for instance in the System requirements) than it appears to me like blank deception.
2. They also haven't said about any restrictions to use neither about any incompatibility with Dual Xeon CPU while they do so for CPU lower than i5: "i5 or equivalent CPU" if that would mean any limit above, where exactly should that be i7 ? i9? of course there is no upward limit named at all!!!
3. I am shocked that they let me buy something, what seems to be known aas unusable. again that would be simply fraud. It is of course that they do not manage to restrict very detailed their selling on customers who "qualify" for a certain product, you can see that not only for every variation of update, upgrade or cross grade. They also do the same with the Kontakt Player Freeware, which you are not able to get ialreadyady a registered user of the Full version. (It would be interesting, if the Kontakt player behave likewise strange on multiple installation and usage as the Full Version does when you paid for multiple Licenses) So if they know only one License can be used on one Account they should prevent those who alredy have it to pay for another. But in my case they did not at all twice.
4. And no what a completely meaningless and wrong Phrase "There are lots of folks around here that would have offered you some help" in total over 3 Weeks 4 User and one NI-Guy "answered" meanwhile none of those answers provided any real help. And how should they, if the mistake is located in restrictions and shortcomings of the NI-License-management, which are mentioned as such exactly nowhere at all whanevertheless don't keep Native Instruments from trying to cheat their existing Customers with selling products which they do not allow to be used. And this is how ever you are trying to cover up with no where stated user conditions simply wrong and a big mistake they should take the responsibility for.