MPC 3.0 How will NI respond?

1356

Comments

  • ozon
    ozon Member Posts: 1,669 Expert

    It’s really easy: If you like the MPC better, get the MPC. No need to get upset or enraged.

  • SLIK P
    SLIK P Member Posts: 2 Member

    The more I see about the MPC update the more I hate it. I wonder how much of the hype is just wanting new things to boast/complain about and then never using the actual device.

  • Lee Stone
    Lee Stone Member Posts: 8 Member
    edited July 29

    Maschine has great integration with the Native Instrument software instruments and effects.

  • Cretin Dilettante
    Cretin Dilettante Member Posts: 171 Advisor

    Nah. You can't make a synth preset entirely from the Maschine hardware for any of their native VST (Without Komplete Kontrol) I will never understand how the company who invented a standard that was supposed to eliminate the tedium of midi mapping can't even integrate that standard into their own products consistently. It's kinda sad I gotta scroll through pages of "Undefined64" before arriving at some more poorly named synth parameters, that only sometimes correspond to the thing you're expecting.

    Here come the discord DJ's, right on schedule. Why would you hate an update to a platform which makes it the perfect musician's sketchbook? They added a master tempo track and audio tracks…that's at least two things MPC3 is slated to do better than Maschine, not even counting all the updates the platform's continually received over the years. You ever try to use the audio module in Maschine? Imagine having to fiddle with that garbage while you're trying to record scratch vocals for your demo. Or trying to track guitar, or any long-form audio file that you'd want to edit in a linear fashion.

  • Cretin Dilettante
    Cretin Dilettante Member Posts: 171 Advisor
    edited July 29

    It wouldn't be appropriate to post my music in a thread whose subject is specifically about a competitor's most recent product updates & how it will influence the development of Maschine, if at all.

    All of that over a joke, dude. I love Maschine and just want to see it better. Mostly, my attitude stems towards the dismissive nature I always get whenever I mention the problems this platform has. Whether it's from NI's social media team on facebook or fellow customers who make music in less technically demanding genres. If you don't understand why you'd want to have a song with more than one BPM, Time Signature, or Key Signature, then don't shout down the people who are asking for the means to do such a thing in this platform. NI can't just say "We make products for DJs dude hahaaaa check out our new kitchen cook-up video on youtube!" cause they've captured a massive section of the film composer market w/ Kontakt. Same thing w/ Linear Audio Recording. The MPC has worse specs than the Maschine, so they can't just tell us it's "too hard" and recommend we record into the audio module as a clip as a "solution"…especially when the audio module is notoriously resource-hungry.

    What if Hans Zimmer were telling y'all "I love Maschine and I want to use it for orchestration. Why can't I do XYZ in it?" instead of some random. Would y'all get just as upset or defensive?

  • djadidai
    djadidai Member Posts: 464 Pro

    if he had done it for a couple of years and it was the essence of nearly every post, yes! But even Hans Zimmer would know maybe not to make that type of music with a tool that wasn’t designed to make that type of music, and then complain he used the wrong tool for it, and then blame NI and everyone else for it. But as always, the problem is with us, mere normal mortals who just don’t see and understand what you see and understand from your seat next to God up in the heavens.

  • macchinista
    macchinista Member Posts: 47 Advisor

    I was mostly speaking about the new arranger which seems very dependent on using the touchscreen.

    As for the Q-Links, unless you are using the X or the Force with plenty of knobs and scribble strips, the workflow is less than ideal. You have to bank constantly and in most cases it is just faster to modify a control directly via the touchscreen. And yes, this is from direct experience on the MPC One.

    Btw, I have no issues with touchscreens, that’s why I was suggesting using an iPad 😉

  • tetsuneko
    tetsuneko Member Posts: 678 Guru

    Hans probably uses Maschine as a plugin in his DAW. Problem sorted?

  • Cretin Dilettante
    Cretin Dilettante Member Posts: 171 Advisor

    Yeah, but now I have to use my DAW's transport control instead of being able to treat the Maschine like a synchronized groovebox where it has its own transport, independent of my DAW. Problem created! ;n;

Back To Top