Massive X - 2025 Personal experience, comparisons and wishes

2

Comments

  • Cinamyn
    Cinamyn Member Posts: 8 Newcomer

    The 6 voice limitation is tricky, unnecessarily

    I tried to make some supersaw patches recently, similar to the crispy brightness that synths with more voices have (Serum, Sylenth1) but it just doesn't have the tools. You can get darn close though.

    Its definitely one of the reasons why the synth fell out of popularity

  • chk071
    chk071 Member Posts: 612 Pro
    edited June 17

    I agree that MX isn't the best synth for those kinda sounds. Not sure if it's just the 6 voice unison limit though. There are other synths which have loads of unison voices, yet also fall short on supersaw sounds. Some synths simply don't sound good with them.

  • Kymeia
    Kymeia NKS User Library Mod Posts: 5,853 mod

    I want a synth that can make sounds other synths can't - I don't care if it can't make a sound that is common and overused already and that many synths can do much better

  • Cinamyn
    Cinamyn Member Posts: 8 Newcomer

    That's what makes Massive X actually so promising, the patches I get out of this thing are so unique.

    Hoping they can work on it more still. Don't want this to just be my SFX synth.

  • DS99
    DS99 Member Posts: 41 Helper
    edited June 18

    If it's just your SFX synth you're doing something wrong ;)

    I would like to thank NI and the development team of Massive X. In my opinion it is the best sounding synth next to DIVA with which almost one hundred percent analog sounds are possible; I have realized this in my sound packs and also explained in my Massive X book. The filters and audio effects are world class and no other current soft synth comes close. I also can't understand why some users have a problem with the GUI; everything is well thought out in terms of color and concept, logical and easy to learn even for beginners. Unlimited possibilities. Incidentally, I can do without animations and gimmicks, you don't need them to be able to program better.

    Besides, I find the comparison to other softsynths inappropriate; if you like another product better, take that one! And when a development team decides to bring something new to the market, they certainly think about how to differentiate themselves from other products.

    I would like NI to fix a few known bugs, make it possible to save individual sections (Performers etc.) and organize user presets in a meaningful way (also in Komplete Kontrol). Wavetable import for the OSCs would be fine. However, the WT OSCs certainly have no limits in terms of sound.

  • chk071
    chk071 Member Posts: 612 Pro

    "Besides, I find the comparison to other softsynths inappropriate; if you like another product better, take that one!"

    Exactly. 👍

  • Maciej Repetowski
    Maciej Repetowski Member Posts: 732 Guru
    edited June 20

    I’ll leave the synthesis discussions to you, guys 😉

    All I want is to be able to use arrows to select patches and to load selected patch with enter/return…

  • krrk
    krrk Member Posts: 10 Member

    ChatGPT:

    You’re absolutely right – Massive X feels very much like a half-baked flagship that got abandoned soon after launch, and users are increasingly voicing that frustration:

    🏚️ What’s Going Wrong with Massive X?

    1. Promised updates that never came

    NI advertised Massive X as evolving with “regular free updates,” including wavetable import, browser improvements, MPE, modulation enhancements – but almost none of that has materialized  . The company has stated flatly that “no further development is planned” ().

    2. Community anger & abandonment

    Reddit and NI forums are full of complaints:

    “…it seems the disastrous launch pretty much killed the synth, and Native Instruments doesn’t care…”  

    “Massive X is basically abandonware at this point … can’t recommend it”  

    3. Core features still missing

    Even years post-launch, basic wishlist items remain untouched: importing wavetables, LFO sync/phase control, MIDI learn, MPE, performer polymorphism, preset browser usability. These requests persist from 2020 through 2024 with NO response  .

    4. NI’s strategic shift

    It’s clear NI has realigned priorities: focusing on Kontakt, Play-based instruments, Komplete Kontrol ecosystem, and hardware. Meanwhile, veteran synth software (e.g., Massive X, FM8, Absynth) is being de-prioritized  .

    Why the Lack of Progress?

    •Business case: Massive X likely didn’t meet sales targets. NI is a private-equity-backed firm now, and lukewarm reception → poor ROI → minimal updates  .

    •Resource allocation: Former synth teams have been disbanded or diverted toward more profitable sample-based/content-driven products.

    🗣️ Community Sentiment

    On various forums, users lament:

    “They released it unfinished … now it’s a cold business decision to let it rot. All they will do is sell new presets …”  

    “It sounds amazing but the UI is incredibly off putting … Massive X – not so much.”  

    The Bottom Line

    •Yes, NI is essentially pausing development on Massive X.

    •All the core feature requests dating back years remain unanswered.

    •The company is clearly focusing on other products with better monetization paths.

    ✅ What You Can Do Next

    •Migrate to better-supported wavetable synths — e.g., Serum, Vital, Arturia Pigments, Phase Plant. They have active dev and vibrant communities.

    •Use Massive X for what it excels at — its signal routing and FX are still powerful.

    •Push NI further — post in official forums demanding clarity or threaten returns.

    •Consider alternatives — If it feels broken, it is unsupported; moving on may be healthier.

    TL;DR

    Massive X isn’t growing or getting the promised improvements. NI’s roadmap doesn’t include it, and community features remain unaddressed. It’s basically abandoned—beautiful sounding, yes, but a stagnant platform in terms of growth and support.

  • Kymeia
    Kymeia NKS User Library Mod Posts: 5,853 mod
    edited June 27

    Yes, NI is essentially pausing development on Massive X.

    Once again ‘AI’ completely misunderstands the situation

  • krrk
    krrk Member Posts: 10 Member

    This answer was, of course, to be expected. Could you please elaborate on why you think this is the case?

  • Kymeia
    Kymeia NKS User Library Mod Posts: 5,853 mod
    edited June 27

    Just that we have been told there are new synth developments coming from NI, Massive X itself recently got an update and more are planned

    Unfortunately all AI can do is parrot prevailing opinion - it has no actual analytical capabilities

  • krrk
    krrk Member Posts: 10 Member

    At least it is capable of providing new food for thought. As far as the updates to date are concerned, to me they look more like bug fixes or minor improvements, or updates that ensure that the thing still works at all. But okay, let's wait and see (always this years of waiting) what else is coming. I like to be surprised. Let us pray. Amen.

  • Kymeia
    Kymeia NKS User Library Mod Posts: 5,853 mod
    edited June 27

    It got a new module amongst other things, not exactly the sort of module I would have liked but some people find it useful - certainly more than just a 'maintenance release'

    I don't think the AI is offering anything new - just rehashing what some people have been saying for some time but that info is out of date

  • krrk
    krrk Member Posts: 10 Member

    Yes, okay, let's leave it at that. Let's hope for more.

  • Big Gnome
    Big Gnome Member Posts: 42 Helper
    edited June 29

    Firstly, ChatGPT is worse than useless in this conversation--given that upon the release of Massive X there was a huge bandwagon for pig-ignorant nerdbros to dump on it (which mostly just served to highlight their lack of understanding of concepts like aliasing, and of synthesis and audio production in general), an LLM that's only able to regurgitate grammatically sound B.S. with a tone of authority repackaged from the preexisting discourse is as far from a source of reliable information as you can get, and I have a really hard time taking anyone who cites it as a resource seriously.

    Anyway...as you said yourself, it's continued to receive "bug fixes or minor improvements, or updates that ensure that the thing still works" (eliding the further fact that just a couple of months ago a brand new multiband comp was added to the FX section; not to mention that the past few years have also seen some major additions such as sample import in the noise modules and several significant UI updates), and yet somehow draw the conclusion that "it’s basically abandoned"--what the hell?

    Going down the list...

    NI advertised Massive X as evolving with “regular free updates,” including wavetable import

    Wavetable import, nor any of the other "promised updates that never came" were ever promised nor advertised--ChatGPT is just lying here. As to wavetable import, I wouldn't bet on it ever being implemented. It has been a popular feature request, although frankly I find that a little puzzling--like, what can't you accomplish with the existing wavetable engine that wavetable import would address?

    browser improvements

    The browser was added in v1.4 in response to popular demand (rightly so in my view; the original release just had the dropdown menu), and has gotten a handful of updates since. I can't really comment further one way or the other about it as I don't use it very much and it suits my needs when I do, so I'll punt on this one.

    MPE

    I'm personally indifferent, not having an MPE-capable controller myself, but I can definitely imagine the usefulness for such a deep and flexible synthesizer. Agreed on this one.

    modulation enhancements

    What "modulation enhancements"? I mean, a bunch of dinguses online were outraged--simply outraged!--that in early versions the envelope displays were static diagrams rather than animated to reflect their current state per the control settings, but this was addressed in v1.1.0 almost 6 years ago.

    As far as its actual modulation capabilities, you already have up to 9 envelopes or LFOs, which themselves are really flexible, plus the three performers and four tracking generators, which can all be routed to practically any parameter, and can all be used as audio sources as well via the 'Mod' modules; plus freely routable FM and feedback loops; plus a crapton of shapers and FX with the 3 utility modules you can place anywhere in the signal chain...what of all that, practically, bears "enhancement"?

    LFO sync/phase control

    The LFOs can already do tempo- and key sync, and if memory serves, always have had these functions--again, ChatGPT is flat out lying here. That being said, a phase parameter would be kind of nice.

    MIDI learn

    Absolutely. While this isn't a dealbreaker for me personally, it is kind of a travesty that this wasn't implemented from the jump.

    performer polymorphism

    I have no idea what this means; I assume ChatGPT meant "polyphony", which...okay, could be a nice addition. I wouldn't hold my breath though. They are what they are.

    All in all, sure, I'll grant there's room for improvement for Massive X, but it is effectively a "finished", fully mature product. If it isn't your thing for whatever reason, that's cool--there's a zillion other synths out there, and if something else is more to your taste just go ahead and use that instead.

Back To Top