Maschine mk2 working within the Maschine 3.x(with limitations)

2»

Comments

  • Kaldosh
    Kaldosh Member Posts: 418 Advisor

    You made me want to upgrade 😂 exactly the kind of twist I like to spend hours on . Though those policies to drop support controllers is a shame . Software is the same they should all work with the idea that each controller depending it’s generation has his advantages, direct buttons, colored screen, touch strips and whatnot. The company would be more trustful going that route. I’d be admirative , grateful and probably keen to keep opening my wallet because I know it’s a good investment like any reliable tool. Instead of that you just know it loses value when it is actually amazing peace of tech every time. Wouldn’t take much to make those tools collectors but instead of that it is marketed to depreciate itself. At the end of the day I’ll end up going back to good old midi versatility with the addition of osc and customise my workflow in a good daw

  • PK The DJ
    PK The DJ Member Posts: 2,365 Expert
    edited November 2024

    D-One said: "How you know he doesn't work remote or something"

    When I use the word "you" I don't literally mean just ozon. I (obviously) mean that in general a person does not have to do those things. If you like, I can edit my posts and change it to read "one doesn't have to".

    If one works remotely, then one does not have to do that on the same computer with Maschine 2 installed.

    Many people choose to keep their "mission critical" computers offline.

  • 6xes
    6xes Member Posts: 824 Pro

    i tried replacing the controller document of the maschine3.0 with the controller document of maschine2.x

    it does not work… unfortunately *smiles

  • 6xes
    6xes Member Posts: 824 Pro

    something like lulu is a useful firewall especially for the MacOS

  • ozon
    ozon Member Posts: 1,954 Expert

    @PK The DJ

    Newsflash - you don't HAVE to upgrade your OS. 

    Did you ever follow your own advice?

    Because I did exactly as you suggest. Stayed on macOS 10.14 for over four years because of abandoned synth hardware drivers. Less fun than you might expect, if you want to keep on using other current software. In the end, I gave up and ditched the (very expensive) synth.

  • PK The DJ
    PK The DJ Member Posts: 2,365 Expert

    Yes, if the circumstances dictate it. I've got lots of old stuff here, going back to the 80s.

  • D-One
    D-One Moderator Posts: 3,652 mod

    It was an example of a reason that staying offline in 2024 is not really a possibility for many people.

    Having multiple computers is also not something the average person can afford… IDK how thats not common sense. The whole advantage of computers if that they can do a tons of things, from making music to replying to work emails and everything in between. Point being that "dont use internet" and "don't update ever" are not a reasonable approach for many people.

  • PK The DJ
    PK The DJ Member Posts: 2,365 Expert

    OK, and my point was that it's not necessary to put one's controller in the bin because it doesn't work with Maschine 3.

  • Rob601
    Rob601 Member Posts: 4 Newcomer

    Can you confirm if Kushview's Elements work in Maschine 3.0 just as it does in 2.x?

  • 6xes
    6xes Member Posts: 824 Pro
    edited November 2024

    Kushview Elements Loads in Maschine 3.0 but becos 3.0 becomes the host, the Maschine MK2 controller wont be recognised.
    if Maschine 2.X is the host the maschine Mk2 controller will work with limitations, when working with maschine 3.0 VST

Back To Top