How to Guide - Wrap your head around our new space 🔍

Thanks for looking into that!

The problem with an answer is that it most often begs for more questions. The chosen answer may be fine having on top, but only if it can be seen where it was answered in the conversation flow. My recent question/thread reads like gibberish due to this error. Have a look:

https://community.native-instruments.com/discussion/545/can-creator-tools-export-specific-volumes-from-all-zones/

Also, if the person that seeks the answer is not happy with the final solution after having found errors with it, the removal or change of the "accepted answer" needs to be able to be changed or modified. That's currently not possible. That will lead others to fall in the same trap of incorrect info. (not for my issue though, but generally speaking)

I realize you want to keep it simple, but this will many times impose more confusion and need for research on the readers than it needs to. After all, tech is complicated stuff. Being able to sort things chronologically would make it usable.

That's the problem, I can only see the 3 dots on the right, just when I finish posting. But I would like to edit my earlier post from a few days ago. How can I do that?

Even if there is a "best answer", which is a questionable concept a lot of the time, it'd be good to be able to read the forum threads in chronological order. Often ideas progress, people can learn from the conversation.

At the moment it's too confusing ... the thread is often lost.

Are moderators subject to the code of conduct rules? Or is it more like, some of those rules don't apply to them? Like not signing posts or whatever

I've had very bad experiences with mod power abuse in communities in which certain people were exempt from certain rules, intransparently and informally. Like, I get that I am opening myself up to ridicule here for, idk, snitching, or pettiness, or rulemongering, or whatever. I don't like that, I don't want that. I know I am making myself vulnerable to heightened scrutiny by mentioning something like this, especially when it's such a small and (in isolation) harmless thing like signing their posts. But that's only surface level, and I'm worried people will deliberately only see that and not the underlying question of power dynamics. Like, if mods get to do this this, which other things do they get to do, maybe to us, with no recourse? Is there a second list of which things it's okay to do for them despite the CoC explicitly asking not to do it, and what's on it? Do we go case by case, and then why have a CoC in the first place? I am super uncomfortable asking about it because I know some will not understand that and only see me complain someone signs their posts, and think me unreasonable for that, as if I'm just trying to be an ****** to get someone who's completely innocent into trouble just for the sake of it. I am so worried that this will be used against me somehow that I feel like I have to write a frickin dissertation here on how I don't actually think that the person signing their posts is abusing their power with that, and that it's the underlying social dynamic that makes it okay for some elements of the CoC to be ignored that gives me a bad vibe. I feel like I must make it exceedingly clear that I am not actually accusing anyone of being a bad actor here. Wow, writing this was stressful.