Simple value change sensor

The time input is carried on the audio clock. Sorry, I should have said so. Remember how they reset the delay modules so they produced no sound until the time of the delay was exhausted after a reset. That's what this does. This code works as follows: whenever a new time value enters the "previous event" module the previous value is sent out and remains out until the next audio clock. During the one cycle delay period the comparator realizes there is a difference and momentarily connects the serial clock to it's upper or true output. The comparator then switches it off on the following clock cycle. Obviously the "previous event" is functioning as a single cycle audio delay but the output of the comparator does not run a chain of audio events downstream, only one clock is passed to the reset during the one cycle delay. You can preload an initial value on startup on the bottom input of the pe module. The problem there is it reloads that value whenever the ensemble is stopped or possibly when a switch is used too. So I chose to use an audio clock on the front panel dial for the time. That guarantees proper initialization right there. But you have a good point, I might be able to use event input for the time control and follow it by dup filter that resets the delay and come out ahead on cpu usage. Good idea, but at least I found a way to do it from a signal carried on the audio clock and shared it. It might come in handy. Later and thanks for the response. I sure have learned a lot in this forum.

Can I connect the output of the dup filter to the reset on those delays directly or would I need something like an event merge in between. The resets accept a clock event without a value. I'll try it I guess. Talk Later, thanks again.

Yeah, True. This might work. I'm pretty sure the ES module sets a true router output on startup. So it should reset the delay. On the other hand the event merge may send out a reset on startup if the bottom input is open. If so leave it open and connect the dup flt to the top of the merge. The two pics might be identical?