Traktor Pro 4 is here!

18911131429

Comments

  • innerdrum
    innerdrum Member Posts: 77 Member

    Please, a bigger discount for customers that trusted your software and/or hardware

  • laszlozoltan
    laszlozoltan Member Posts: 3 Member
  • dos.groovy
    dos.groovy Member Posts: 2 Member
    edited July 17
    There is a fundamental misunderstanding between what DJs want from flexible beatgrids and what Native Instruments believes DJs need these flexible beatgrids for.
    

  • Eufeion
    Eufeion Member Posts: 3 Member

    Does Traktor Pro 4 support the legacy Traktor Kontrol S2 MK1 ?

  • djrickym
    djrickym Member Posts: 3 Member

    Just tested the Stems separation with two tracks, the original radio version of Anna of the North's "Dandelion", and (intentionally) a House remix of Adele's "Rolling In The Deep", both from a widely-known record pool.

    I only used the software. Will test tomorrow using my D2s. My mixer is the lovely-sounding, analog Allen & Heath Xone PX5, hooked to Rockit studio monitors and high-end Pioneer cans. (I didn't use its internal digital FX. Will try that later, and also using QSC speakers). I use a MacBook Pro M1 16" from late 2021, and Sonoma 14.5.

    I have experience using stem separation from both DJ app and a DAW but won't get into comparisons yet.

    Initial observations:

    (1) "Dandelion" — wanted to see if I could layer the vocals over an instrumental House track, simulating the start of a set. The quality of her vocals was quite impressive. I first played only the vocals, then brought the House track in.

    (2) "Rolling In The Deep" — I intentionally used a "bootleg" House remix from a record pool. Adele's voice came through very nicely, but not as sharp or crisp as Anna's. I suspect bc sometimes these "bootleg" remixes use a DIY vocal stem and not a studio-quality one. This is a phenomenon I've seen especially since the pandemic.

    Question for NI: I noticed the two stem files Traktor created use the .mp3 file extension, not .mp4. Why is that? Doesn't make sense.

    Note: Be aware that if you delete the parent track from your collection Traktor will also delete the new stem file.

    Like I said, I also plan to do tests using AIFF files (from Traxsource and Beatport), plus also WAV files from different House CDs from the late 90s and 2000s.

    In conclusion, THANKS to NI's development team!!!

    This is a **massive** upgrade, totally worth the cost, even before I test the flexible beatgrids.

    Kudos also for ending the subscription scheme!

    Peace

  • Nico_Tf
    Nico_Tf Member Posts: 37 Helper

    Tested the new beatgrids, using my old nemesis, the 12“ version of The Whispers-And The Beat Goes On. The drumming of the intro is all over the place, there are several tempo changes, etc.

    Well, I’m mightily impressed, this is so useful! Thanks to the team!

  • CennyHuksy
    CennyHuksy Member Posts: 1 Newcomer

    Hi there, something you guys really need to implement now that you have STEMS and machine learning in Traktor Pro 4, is Settings > Controller Manager > Add In (Something for controlling the generated STEM levels on decks… like being able to kill the drums on a track with a nob)

  • carlosjn
    carlosjn Member Posts: 5 Member

    Congratulations for this update. I'm frustrated about stems separation as it takes space on the HD and can't be done in batches but one track at a time. Not very useful.

  • 808FX
    808FX Member Posts: 1 Newcomer

    Just ran the TP4 demo and there is still no Retina (high DPI) support on MacBooks - 12 YEARS after they first appeared! Don't know how the backlog is prioritized at NI, but this is pretty sad. No need to upgrade on my side, TP3 is stable and looks just as blurry as TP4. I would have gladly given you my money, but that would make you think it's OK to neglect optics on Mac's. Wake me when you've caught up with the rest of the software developing world…

  • Owner
    Owner Member Posts: 557 Guru

    I'm with you about the new UI, it just follows the trend to make everything darker, like the competition also does and besides the lack of retina support I'm still missing a daylight option.


    But to be fair: I think the beta testers are not included in design -aspects or -decisions in this regard. Normally they have only patches with new features and can go through it and leave their feedback about it.

  • Owner
    Owner Member Posts: 557 Guru

    No, not much has changed in terms of hardware integration. The only new additions are support for the Reloop Flux and the DJM-A9.

    Besides of that, i wouldn't recommend the Reloop Elite to anyone who only wants to DJ with Traktor. I have one because i thought i could map it myself to use it with Traktor. But i had to come to the conclusion that it wasn't worth it. Too many buttons are hard-wired and don't send midi, just HID, which makes it extremely difficult.

    I then wrote to Reloop directly and asked for support, but don't received some of it. Just the recommendation that i should use it with Serato instead of Traktor.

    I now only use it for sessions with djay Pro or Serato. That is where its strengths lie and best suits its application profile.

  • Owner
    Owner Member Posts: 557 Guru

    It won't affect TP3 if you're upgrading to TP4. Everything should be as before and you always can roll back to another installed Version of TP.

This discussion has been closed.
Back To Top