Please note that we've been made aware of a scam involving someone impersonating Native Instruments.
Read our community note - here.

M+ standalone optimized Reaktor content from the community

1…1718192022

Comments

  • unbrokendub
    unbrokendub Member Posts: 8 Member

    Hi all. Found very good synth to run on M+ in this topic, and tryed to adopt one synth that i found on elektronaus called Parasite 2(Unfortunataly google dont find any info about this. Only info inside ensemble says it by Tatarise).

    After few hours of trying, i was able to correctly map to M+ only init preset, but if i load another preset, that baked in ensemble, i again see the mess of the parameters.

    Does anyone know how to correctly adopt this synth with stored presets?

    The original ens:

    Parasite v2.0.ens

    Cheers

    Denis

  • unbrokendub
    unbrokendub Member Posts: 8 Member

    Mapped most of the parameters as Init preset. At this point it already useful.

    Parasite v2.2.ens
  • tetsuneko
    tetsuneko Member Posts: 844 Expert
    https://community.native-instruments.com/discussion/comment/217506#Comment_217506

    Unfortunately I'm not as at home with NKS mappings as I'd like, and so far do not know how to have several snapshots retain the NKS mappings required for M+. This is the reason why I always only include only a single snapshot with my M+ optimized ensembles..

    However, there is a way to make this work. IIRC someone in this thread already said they know how to do it..

  • Kymeia
    Kymeia NKS User Library Mod Posts: 5,501 mod

    Does it have snapshots? I can only see the init

  • tetsuneko
    tetsuneko Member Posts: 844 Expert

    Seems like this forum has something changed under the hood.. I am getting reports that some of the .ens files posted in this thread no longer download? Instead of offering an .ens file, it offers a JSON with only an error code inside..

    Which NI forum mod should I contact about this?

    This also means that using this thread for posting M+ optimized content is no longer a safe option.. I am contemplating on perhaps creating a new, self-contained repository for this stuff, which wouldn't become abandonware as soon as something changes again on this forum.. The RUL is still missing that "M+ optimized" tag so I dont know if I want to use it, especially for stuff thats in beta..

  • tetsuneko
    tetsuneko Member Posts: 844 Expert
    edited March 23

    I am thinking I could invest a bit of my own money and throw together a good old fashioned blogsite of sorts, concentrating on all things Maschine+ standalone related. This would allow me to host all the ensembles as well, as well as making possible to author articles of various topics regarding the Maschine+. Ideally, NI would offer us these things, but it seems unclear at best how much Kontakt/Reaktor User content related support NI wants us to have.. I mean, its been a year since I asked about getting "M+ optimized" tag for the RUL, and still crickets…

    Looking for suggestions on what tech stack to go with. Would something like a wordpress site be a sensible solution? Ideally it'd have a slick file hosting, support articles with rich formatting / embeds, and allow some sort of commenting of the articles.. And it should have at least passable security/antispam features available..

    Also need a name for the thing! M-PLUS- prefix? M-PLUS-INSIDER? M-PLUS-ADDICTS? M-PLUS-MANIA? Something else? I'm not super good with names..

  • unbrokendub
    unbrokendub Member Posts: 8 Member

    Also adopt this 303 clone for standalone:

    https://www.native-instruments.com/en/reaktor-community/reaktor-user-library/entry/show/15495/

    File:

    tb303.ens

    Sounds good, and building a sequence is anyway faster with knobs, than on the original tb-303 :)

  • Astralbeats_225
    Astralbeats_225 Member Posts: 57 Advisor
    edited March 23
    https://community.native-instruments.com/discussion/comment/217768#Comment_217768

    Would there be any issues with using "Maschine_Plus_artisans" I think having the full Maschine name would make it more easily searchable on Google. If that would cause any copyright… etc issues then M-Plus or M_Plus would be a good prefix.

    I also am disappointed that the M+ optimized tag is not available in the RUL. I've been building and testing ensembles from scratch, but it sucks that when I post them it's gonna be lost in a sea of ensembles

  • Flexi
    Flexi Member Posts: 415 Guru

    Just call it the Maschine User Library, if you need web space I can provide it, just about to change my hosting provider though, so I have some sites to transfer first, Wordpress is the simplest to get it up and running if you want a blog, I have unlimited sites on Directorist and Oxygen if you wanted to make it fancy.

  • tetsuneko
    tetsuneko Member Posts: 844 Expert
    https://community.native-instruments.com/discussion/comment/217812#Comment_217812

    Looking at the UI, I'm counting around 80 parameters.. so should be doable, if a bit laborous to map.. But how would one map the sequencer controls so that it'd still be a usable solution in M+ standalone? With 16 steps, you'd have to split every parameter lane into two consecutive encoder banks..

    Most of the work involved would revolve around making the mapping

  • tetsuneko
    tetsuneko Member Posts: 844 Expert
    edited March 24
    https://community.native-instruments.com/discussion/comment/217880#Comment_217880

    "Maschine User Library" sounds great, but I want something in the title to reflect the fact that the blog/site/whatever revolves only around using Maschine+ in standalone mode, to distinguish it from all the existing Maschine desktop content, which is already plentiful on the interwebs.

    I know a bit of CSS so I could make a Wordpress instance look decent enough (Copying the look of, say, Maschine 2 software perhaps?). Never heard about Directorist nor Oxygen, are those new? Havent been keeping up with web site tech since 2010s to be honest..

  • unbrokendub
    unbrokendub Member Posts: 8 Member
    https://community.native-instruments.com/discussion/comment/217907#Comment_217907

    tb303.ens file is already compatible with maschine plus. I changed some mappings inside ensemble to make it work. So it is have 11 pages, where 6 for sequencer, but it is easy to make sequences because of randomiser inside.

  • Aesys93
    Aesys93 Member Posts: 1 Newcomer

    Hi to you all, Sorry to Jump on this thread without any really usefull info, but as a new maschine+ user i want tò show you how much your efforts and your brilliant ideas are appreciated, i'm starting tò study reaktor tò be a little helpfull too.

    @tetsuneko Is It possibile tò contribute to the creation of the blog economically ? I really would like to donate tò support the project.

    In total thanks a lot tò all of you, Sorry again for interrupting ♥️

  • unbrokendub
    unbrokendub Member Posts: 8 Member

    Do you guys have this problem where 3rd party reaktor ensembles works only for half of an hour? It is because i dont have a full reaktor license?

  • tetsuneko
    tetsuneko Member Posts: 844 Expert
    https://community.native-instruments.com/discussion/comment/217917#Comment_217917

    Could be. IIRC, using User ensembles with a Maschine+ requires full Reaktor 6 licence in your Native Access account. If you already have this, contact NI support, they will be able to fix any licencing issues on their end and you'll get full functionality for M+ (this happened to me, NI support sorted it out)

Back To Top

Categories